Dear Susan Cain,
Upon reading your article "The Rise of the New
Groupthink," you really made a good point on the way people think
creatively. It is very true that people work better as a team, but the real
creativity comes out and shine is when people are in an isolated area, where
they are comfortable enough to sit there and think of new ideas and thoughts. The
way you mentioned that "individuals almost always perform better than
groups in both quality and quantity, and group performance gets worse as group
size increases" (Cain 2012). The perfect example, that I think, from your
article is when you stated: "Mr. Wozniak got the work done - the sheer
hard work of creating something from nothing - he did it alone. Late at night,
all by himself" (Cain 2012). But the idea of cooperating in a group can
start something great also contradicts this belief. Like author Clay Shirky
stated in his article "Here comes everybody." When a group of people
decided to become a community and join in on certain projects, they have the
ability to achieve and produce better things than those individual minds makes
themselves. He stated: "Because enough people thought of using Wikipedia
as a coordinating resource, it became one, and because it became one, more
people learned to think of it as a coordinating resource" (Shirky 117). In
this contact, Wikipedia is the idea that people thought of. The website cannot
really become great until people from various places with different knowledge
input their own experiences into it. This example really showed how team work
can sometimes be better than individual work. But then again, it is amazing how
well the users of Wikipedia cooperated with one another. The way people
actually post genuine information toward one content. According to Andrew
Keen's article "The cult of the amateur," what he stated can be seen
as the unproductive aspect of certain creative minds. He said: "In a
flattened, editor-free world where independent videographers, podcasters, and
bloggers can post their amateurish creations at will, and no one is being paid
to check their credentials or evaluate their material, media is vulnerable to
untrustworthy content of every stripe" (Keen 19). From this we can see
that not all people are there to share accurate and resourceful information, instead they would upload misinformation and
disinformation where they have no basis, misdirecting people all over the
world. So is it better to work by yourself or as a community? It really all
depends on whether people actually take responsibility for the information they
try to contribute.
No comments:
Post a Comment