Dear Susan Cain,
Your
article on the new "Groupthink"really captivated me. This is true as you
related it to many of the collaborative practices that occur in
everyone's lives now a days in modern society. In fact, the educational
system as you mentioned prides itself on educating upcoming individuals
the importance of effectively collaborating in a group. At least that is
what the general consensus seems to indicate. Your article on the other
hand goes against this and suggests that perhaps working a group
environment is not the most ideal solution to solving problems. It may
not even be the best solution for general creativity in a variety of
different matters. You argue that the dynamics of people working
together can be counter productive to whatever tasks are trying to be
completed at hand. The fact that there are others around you can
potentially make you more reliant on these people to complete the work.
Likewise, this mentality can have the effect of making you agree with
the other members of the team in an effort to expedite what ever task is
at hand. This can also occur with the active knowledge that the
decision you are agreeing with may not actually be correct or fully
suited to whatever is trying to be accomplished. Like many other people,
I thought that collaboration would be the best solution to forming
creative ideas. However your brief descriptions have really convinced me
other wise.
Clay Shirky, the author of "Here Comes
Everybody" makes a different argument for collaboration stating that it
can be beneficial. However, the studies conducted in that article dealt
with a much larger scale, namely that of the online encyclopedia,
Wikipedia. However, there is an important coorrelation that I noticed
which I believe supports your position on the effectiveness of
collaboration. Within the article there is mention that a majority of
the work done on topics on the site is performed by a small handful of
people. This seems to mimic the scenario of a small group session where
some members may be riding on the efforts of the more active
individuals. Therefore, even if they have something insightful to
contribute, they may be less inclined to do so. I believe for this
reason your position on the matter is indeed valid. Another author,
Andrew Keen, discusses how the power of web 2.0 may in fact work to
hinder creativity. Web 2.0, essentially the two way flow of information,
can be seen as the ultimate collaboration tool. However, the exposure
to the various forms of media can become an issue, especially with the
quantity that is available.With so much user generated content filling
the web, true creativity can become masked. I believe a person can be
influenced by an idea that has already been released into the web. In
this instance, working alone may allow a person to really demonstrate
their true creativity, or work towards a solution that will not be
influenced by another persons. For all of these reasons, I do see truth
to your argument Susan Cain.
Sincerely,
Jonathan Thai
No comments:
Post a Comment