Dear Sherry Tickle,
After reading your article I now have a better sense of what the time
Alone Together really means. Even though we are connecting with one
another though technology and connecting with the mass/medium we are really
alone. As technology changes it are offering substitutes for connecting
with each other face-to-face. The internet, instant-message, e-mail,
test, and twitter, these machines are creating a world of mediated relationships
by using these networked devices. I agree with almost everything you had
to say about technology and how it is ultimately redrawing the boundaries
between intimacy and solitude.
Personally, I feel that even though it would be nice to have a robot walk,
talk, do, say, whatever we like, I mean because this ultimately would be such a
great thing, and it is completely understanding why people could relate to
these robots, to me it is not ideal. As
you stated that people think it is more efficient to choose keyboards over the
human voice, because “real time” takes too much time. We need to remember that
even though the idea of these robots might help bring more fulfillments to
happiness, that god created humans, not robots to be humans. Hiding behind these network devices, in which
we are connecting to the outside world, is actually leaving us distant, and
alone, rather than the “real” togetherness.
I am an old fashion type of girl when it comes to expressing yourself in
others ways than texting, and emailing, but I am also very much connected with
my IPhone. Although sometimes I prefer texting
more than talking I still adhere to face-to-face interaction still. I would never be able to connect with a robot
romantically, or intimately. To have a ROBOT as a friend might be interesting, and fun, but nothing could really
compare to the “real” thing.
I'd like to see more direct response to the writers' arguments. And it's Turkle, not Tickle!
ReplyDelete